peter_dawyndt02
Jul '11

When implementing custom judges for the evaluation of specific problems, the only option to update those judges seems to be to upload a newer version of the custom judge instead of replacing the previous version. As custom judges as shared between problems, this has a number of drawbacks:

  • switching to the newer version of the custom judge needs to be done fore each problem that uses the judge
  • results in a long drop down list of (deprecated) judges

As a somewhat related problem, each submitted judges receives a default name “Problem ‘problem_name’ judge”. It would be more enveloping if more generic custom judges could be properly named.

So a request for two additional features:

  • possibility to assign self-explaining name to custom judges
  • possibility to update custom judges 'in place'

  • created

    Jul '11

  • last reply

    Nov '11
  • 1

    reply

  • 436

    views

  • 2

    users

4 months later
voidstar
Nov '11

I support Peter's request. I think it would be good to have some way to organize (delete/edit/rename) the custom judges.