224 / 315
Aug 2013
12 days later
3 months later
21 days later

Look at this amazing part of "Terms of Services" in Coursera website .... I think they should add one in spoj ...

I agree. Both user is also submitted same code to my problem CRCLE_E1. Here is the screenshot:


By the way, this picture isn't spoiler because it only show <25% of overall code. and only contain meaningless information.

It's hard to clean all cheater. Because currently there are more than 200K users on SPOJ. I just consider the big cheater with high points (on main SPOJ site), rapidly solve many problem just in few minutes. If I found cheater with match that criteria, I'll definitely report here to be banned by admin.

19 days later
1 month later

Respected Sir,

Please look into this account : [spoj.com/users/hariprasath/](http://www.spoj.com/users/hariprasath/)

The user has submitted too many solutions in a very short time frame as on 08.11.2013 & it seems suspicious.

Your Sincerely,
Ouditchya Sinha.

1 month later
1 month later
25 days later

I find very annoying cheaters that destroy PIBO problem (and many others), see here3 and here2 ; I guess all codes with 1.86±0.01s 3.0M C++ are clones...
Last user Legrand2 have yet often do the same. Note that he's not always a cheater.

===

had been yet banished1... still present, curious.
On my problem REBOUND, he viciously unindent a code found on the web. This user could be banished again.

===

Kaushik Barman (id recently changed to "power boy") had been yet banished last year. He's back with a new probable technic : copy/paste a code ; change some few chars ; oh, incredible, I have RE or SIGSEV or WA ; try again one two times, and then AC ; wait some minutes do the same with another problem. We are not fool.

==

Please report strange actions, and suggests propositions to ovoid such things.

A new one : http://www.spoj.com/status/makaveli/8 : Dariusz Lasecki

He 'does' that Sunday evening, haha.
Last week :

And the previous Sunday :

But what can we do about these users? Just reporting them is not fixing the problem. I think they should be immediately removed.

Another one (edit : maybe/maybe not...??????):
http://www.spoj.com/status/sanguine13/6 : S. R. Putra

(Only a part of the fact)
Edit : But according to two submissions on two of my problems, solutions seems genuine.
This is a very curious thing in any case ...
A (reasonable) possibility for that user is : he deleted his account, create a new one and submit it's own AC solution again. But I'm not sure...

===
@storyless : when admin take a look at this thread, they make some clean up.
I hope there will be one day an automatic tool to prevent such pollution.